Fluid Bed Coater (Wurster/Bottom Spray) – DQ Protocol

Design Qualification Protocol for Fluid Bed Coater in Solid Dosage Form

Document Number: DQ-FBC-001

Version: 1.0

Date: 2023-10-05

Prepared by: [Your Name]

Reviewed by: [Reviewer Name]

Approved by: [Approver Name]

Objective

The objective of this Design Qualification (DQ) protocol is to ensure that the Fluid Bed Coater (Wurster/Bottom Spray) is appropriately designed to meet the specified requirements for pellet coating in solid dosage form production.

Scope

This protocol covers the validation of the Fluid Bed Coater used in the production area for coating pellets, including the assessment of critical parameters and compliance with applicable regulatory standards.

Responsibilities

The Validation Team is responsible for executing this protocol, while the Quality Assurance (QA) team will oversee compliance and documentation.

Prerequisites

  • Completion of User Requirement Specification (URS)
  • Installation Qualification (IQ) completed
  • Operational Qualification (OQ) completed

Equipment Description

The Fluid Bed Coater (Wurster/Bottom Spray) is designed for the coating of pellets with a variety of coating solutions. It operates using a bottom spray method, ensuring uniform coating and optimal product quality.

Test Plan

Test ID Procedure Acceptance Criteria Evidence
DQ-FBC-01 Verify airflow temperature Within specified range as per URS Annex11 Calibration records
DQ-FBC-02 Check spray rate Consistent with URS Annex11 Spray rate logs
DQ-FBC-03 Monitor filter differential pressure (DP) DP within acceptable limits as per URS Annex11 DP monitoring records
DQ-FBC-04 Verify PLC functionality PLC operates without errors PLC test results
See also  Spheronizer / Marumerizer – Traceability Matrix (URS ↔ Tests)

Detailed Test Cases

Test Case 1: Verify Airflow Temperature

Procedure: Measure the airflow temperature using calibrated thermocouples.

Acceptance Criteria: Airflow temperature must be within the specified range as defined in URS Annex11.

Evidence: Calibration records and temperature logs must be maintained.

Test Case 2: Check Spray Rate

Procedure: Measure the spray rate during operation using flow meters.

Acceptance Criteria: Spray rate must be consistent with the parameters outlined in URS Annex11.

Evidence: Spray rate logs must be documented.

Test Case 3: Monitor Filter Differential Pressure (DP)

Procedure: Monitor the differential pressure across the filter during operation.

Acceptance Criteria: DP must remain within acceptable limits as per URS Annex11.

Evidence: DP monitoring records must be collected and reviewed.

Test Case 4: Verify PLC Functionality

Procedure: Conduct functionality tests on the PLC to ensure proper operation.

Acceptance Criteria: PLC must operate without errors and provide accurate readings.

Evidence: PLC test results must be documented.

Deviations

Any deviations from the acceptance criteria must be documented and investigated. A corrective action plan must be developed and approved before proceeding.

Approvals

All sections of this protocol must be reviewed and approved by designated personnel before execution.