Drug Distribution Uniformity Validation in Rectal Gels Manufacturing

Drug Distribution Uniformity Validation in Rectal Gels Manufacturing: Ensuring Consistent Dosage

Ensuring Drug Distribution Uniformity Validation in Rectal Gels Manufacturing

All equipment used in this process validation must be duly qualified and validated for its intended use and performance specifications. Equipment qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ) is assumed to be completed prior to this process validation.

Introduction to Drug Distribution Uniformity in Rectal Gels

Drug distribution uniformity is critical in rectal gels to guarantee that each unit dose delivers the intended therapeutic effect without variability. Validation of drug distribution uniformity ensures that the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is evenly dispersed throughout the gel matrix. Failure in this regard can lead to suboptimal efficacy or safety risks due to dose variation.

In rectal gels manufacturing, the semi-solid nature and viscosity present unique challenges to uniform distribution of the drug. Therefore, validating uniformity is a fundamental component of the overall process validation strategy aligned with current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP).

Role of Drug Distribution Uniformity in cGMP and Process Consistency

Under cGMP regulations, consistent product quality and safety must be demonstrably maintained throughout manufacturing. Drug distribution uniformity validation addresses the critical quality attribute (CQA) of content uniformity, ensuring that each dose released meets predefined specifications. Variations in uniformity directly impact patient safety and product efficacy and, therefore, must be rigorously evaluated during process validation.

Systematic validation confirms that the manufacturing process is capable of producing rectal gels with uniform drug distribution across multiple batches under normal operating conditions. This not only supports batch release but also reduces batch failures and supports regulatory compliance by demonstrating control over content uniformity.

Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) and Drug Distribution

The Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) defines the ideal characteristics of the rectal gel formulation. Within the QTPP, drug distribution uniformity is a key attribute to achieve consistent dosing and therapeutic outcomes. The QTPP typically includes:

  • Uniform drug content in each dose volume.
  • Physical characteristics that ensure homogeneity (e.g., appropriate viscosity and consistency)
  • Stability of drug distribution during shelf life.

Alignment of the manufacturing process with the QTPP enables consistent production and provides a framework for validating critical steps involved in achieving drug uniformity.

Desired Attributes of Uniform Drug Distribution in Rectal Gels

To ensure uniformity, the rectal gel must exhibit the following attributes:

  1. Homogeneous Dispersion of API: The API particles or solution must be evenly suspended or dissolved throughout the gel matrix without aggregation or sedimentation.
  2. Consistent Rheological Properties: Appropriate viscosity to prevent phase separation or sedimentation during manufacturing and storage.
  3. Unit Dose Consistency: Each dose dispensed should contain drug content within predefined limits as per pharmacopeial standards (e.g., typically ±10% of label claim).
  4. Physical Stability: Resistance to changes in gel consistency that might affect distribution uniformity, such as syneresis or crystallization.

Impact of Drug Distribution Uniformity on QTPP

Achieving and maintaining drug distribution uniformity directly influences several QTPP elements, including potency, safety, and patient compliance:

  • Potency and Efficacy: Uniform drug distribution ensures each administered dose delivers a consistent and effective amount of API, supporting therapeutic efficacy.
  • Safety: Prevents dose spikes or sub-therapeutic levels that could lead to adverse effects or treatment failure.
  • Product Appearance and Acceptability: Physically uniform gels are more acceptable to patients, improving adherence.

Non-uniformity would undermine the QTPP and could result in regulatory noncompliance and product recalls.

Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) Relevant to Drug Distribution Uniformity

Effective validation focuses on CQAs that reflect the uniformity of drug dispersion throughout the gel matrix. These CQAs typically include:

  • Assay Uniformity: Measurement of API concentration across multiple representative samples from a single batch.
  • Particle Size Distribution: For gels containing suspended APIs, particle size impacts dispersion and bioavailability.
  • Viscosity and Rheometry: Physical properties influencing drug suspension stability.
  • pH and Osmolality: Factors that may influence drug solubility and gel consistency.
  • Content Uniformity Test Results: Typically assessed using validated analytical methods such as HPLC or UV spectrophotometry on samples taken from different batch locations.

Key Properties Affecting Drug Distribution Uniformity in Rectal Gels

Several intrinsic and extrinsic properties affect the ability to achieve uniform drug distribution:

  1. Formulation Characteristics: Selection of appropriate excipients (e.g., gelling agents, suspending agents) to stabilize API dispersion.
  2. Mixing and Homogenization Parameters: Optimization of mixing speed, time, and order of addition to promote uniform dispersion.
  3. API Characteristics: Solubility, particle size, and polymorphic form influence dispersibility and stability within the gel.
  4. Processing Temperature and Shear: Controlled to prevent phase separation and maintain gel integrity.
  5. Filling and Packaging Techniques: Uniform filling volumes and minimal segregation during transfer to final containers support dose uniformity.

Thorough understanding and control of these properties during process development and scale-up are essential to ensure successful validation outcomes.

Desired Attributes of Drug Distribution Uniformity in Rectal Gels

Achieving uniform drug distribution in rectal gels involves meeting several desired attributes that ensure therapeutic effectiveness and patient safety:

  • Homogeneous dispersion of the API throughout the gel matrix to prevent dose variability.
  • Consistent gel viscosity that facilitates uniform mixing and ease of administration.
  • Stable physical and chemical properties that maintain uniformity throughout the product’s shelf life.
  • Reproducible manufacturing process parameters that support batch-to-batch consistency.

Impact of Drug Distribution Uniformity on QTPP

Uniform drug distribution profoundly impacts the QTPP by directly influencing key safety and efficacy profiles:

  • Dose Accuracy: Ensures every unit of gel contains the intended drug amount, critical for therapeutic consistency.
  • Stability: Prevents localized degradation or API aggregation that could negatively affect product shelf life and performance.
  • Patient Compliance: Uniform texture and dosing consistency improve patient acceptability and adherence.

Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) Related to Drug Distribution Uniformity

The validation of drug distribution uniformity targets several CQAs integral to rectal gel quality:

  • Content Uniformity: Quantitative assay of API concentration across multiple samples from each batch.
  • Viscosity and Rheological Properties: Affect the homogeneity and flow behavior during manufacture and use.
  • pH and Osmolality: Influence drug solubility and stability within the gel matrix, indirectly impacting uniformity.
  • Physical Stability: Absence of phase separation or sedimentation over time.
See also  Adhesion Strength Validation in Buccal Tablets Manufacturing

Key Properties to Monitor During Validation

In the validation protocol, monitoring the following properties ensures consistent drug distribution throughout the manufacturing process:

  1. Sampling Strategy: Systematic collection of samples from different locations and depths within the gel batch.
  2. Analytical Methodology: Use of validated analytical methods such as HPLC or UV spectroscopy for precise quantification of the API.
  3. Viscosity Measurement: Routine viscosity testing to confirm uniform gel consistency, using rotational viscometers or rheometers.
  4. Mixing Time and Speed: Optimization and control of mixing parameters to ensure homogeneous dispersion.
  5. Temperature Control: Maintaining stable manufacturing temperatures to prevent phase separation and maintain API solubility.

Risk Assessment and Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA) for Drug Distribution Uniformity

Begin by conducting a detailed Risk Assessment focusing on drug distribution uniformity within the rectal gel matrix. Identify all potential failure points that may cause non-uniform drug content, such as inadequate mixing, segregation during transfer, temperature fluctuations, or equipment malfunctions.

Perform a Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) to systematically evaluate each identified failure mode. For each failure point, assign:

  • Severity (S): Rate the potential impact on product quality and patient safety, typically on a scale from 1 (low) to 10 (high).
  • Occurrence (O): Estimate the frequency of failure considering historical data and process knowledge.
  • Detectability (D): Assess the likelihood that the failure will be detected before product release.

Calculate the Risk Priority Number (RPN = S × O × D) for each failure mode. Prioritize critical failure points with high RPNs for focused control strategy development.

Process Flow and Identification of Critical Process Parameters (CPPs)

Map the entire manufacturing process flow for rectal gel production, emphasizing steps that influence drug distribution uniformity:

  1. Dispensing of active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) and excipients.
  2. Pre-mixing of dry components (if applicable).
  3. Gel base preparation and heating (if necessary).
  4. API incorporation into the gel mass.
  5. Homogenization and mixing.
  6. Cooling and final viscosity adjustment.
  7. Filling and packaging.

Identify CPPs specifically influencing uniform drug distribution, such as:

  • Mixing speed and time.
  • Temperature control during mixing and cooling.
  • Shear rate applied during homogenization.
  • Batch size effects on mixing efficiency.
  • Sampling locations and mixing chamber design.

Design of Experiments (DoE) for Optimizing Drug Distribution Uniformity

Develop a structured Design of Experiments (DoE) to evaluate the impact of selected CPPs on drug uniformity. The DoE should allow identification of optimal operational conditions by varying parameters such as mixing speed, temperature, and homogenization time.

  • Choose an appropriate experimental design such as factorial, fractional factorial, or response surface methodology.
  • Define response variables focusing on drug distribution uniformity metrics (e.g., assay variation within and between gel samples).
  • Include replicates to assess process variability.

Analyze DoE results to establish CPP ranges that ensure consistent drug uniformity.

Control Strategy Development

Based on risk assessment and DoE outcomes, develop a robust control strategy to maintain drug distribution uniformity. This includes:

  • Setting CPP operating ranges, including acceptable limits for mixing speed, time, and temperature.
  • Implementing in-process controls (IPCs) such as real-time viscosity monitoring or mixing torque measurement.
  • Establishing sampling and testing protocols during batch manufacturing.
  • Applying corrective action procedures when deviations are detected.

Sampling Plan and Decision Points during Batch Manufacturing

Design a systematic sampling plan to monitor drug distribution uniformity across the batch:

  • Define multiple sampling points within the batch—beginning, middle, and end of mixing, and after homogenization.
  • Specify sample size and number of replicates per location to ensure representative sampling.
  • Include sampling prior to filling and packaging to confirm uniformity throughout the bulk gel.

Decision points include acceptance criteria based on pharmacopeial assay limits and uniformity ranges. If samples fall outside acceptable ranges at any stage, initiate batch hold and investigation procedures as per quality management protocols.

Protocol Design for Process Performance Qualification (PPQ)

Develop a comprehensive PPQ protocol tailored for drug distribution uniformity validation in rectal gels. The protocol should include:

  1. Objectives: Confirm that the manufacturing process consistently produces rectal gels meeting uniformity specifications.
  2. Scope: Define batches to be validated, including scale and any process variations.
  3. Responsibilities: Assign roles for manufacturing, quality control, and validation teams.
  4. Process description and flow diagram: Detailed summary of manufacturing steps affecting uniformity.
  5. CPPs and acceptance criteria: Enumerate parameters and quality attributes to be evaluated.
  6. Sampling and testing plan: Include sampling points, testing methods, and frequency.
  7. Data analysis methodology: Statistical approaches for uniformity evaluation.
  8. Deviation and investigation procedures: Outline handling of out-of-specification results.
  9. Approval and signature section: For protocol authorization and review.

Batch Execution and Evaluation of Results

Execute the PPQ batches strictly following the approved protocol:

  1. Ensure all equipment is qualified and calibrated.
  2. Record all CPPs and IPC data in real-time during manufacturing.
  3. Collect samples per the sampling plan and perform assay and uniformity testing using validated analytical methods.
  4. Analyze data statistically to confirm compliance with acceptance criteria—uniformity typically demonstrated by %RSD within predefined limits.
  5. Investigate any deviations or failures thoroughly, implementing corrective actions where necessary.
  6. Prepare a comprehensive PPQ report summarizing batch results, deviations, and conclusions on process capability regarding drug uniformity.

Monitoring and Ongoing Control

Post-validation, establish a continuous monitoring program to ensure sustained uniform drug distribution:

  • Incorporate routine in-process sampling during commercial manufacturing with established acceptance criteria.
  • Use trending techniques to detect any drift or shifts in process performance.
  • Review CPP data and product quality attributes periodically as part of the ongoing process verification (OPV) framework.
  • Implement a change control process to evaluate and validate any future process modifications that may impact drug distribution.
See also  Dose Delivery Accuracy Validation in Drug-Device Combinations Manufacturing

Maintaining vigilance with this structured approach ensures consistent quality and regulatory compliance in rectal gel manufacturing.

Control Strategy and Establishment of Acceptable Ranges

Based on the DoE findings and FMEA prioritization, establish a robust control strategy targeting the critical process parameters influencing drug distribution uniformity. For each CPP, define acceptable operational ranges that ensure consistent drug content uniformity:

  • Mixing Speed and Time: Specify minimum and maximum speeds and durations validated to provide homogenous distribution without degrading the gel matrix.
  • Temperature Control: Set temperature ranges during mixing and cooling phases to maintain gel integrity and prevent API degradation or migration.
  • Shear Rate During Homogenization: Control shear to optimize particle dispersion while avoiding over-shearing.
  • Batch Size: Define batch size limits ensuring that scale-up does not compromise uniformity.

Implement real-time monitoring systems where feasible to maintain CPPs within these pre-defined limits during manufacturing batches.

Sampling Plan and Decision Points during Validation

Develop a statistically sound sampling plan to assess drug distribution uniformity throughout batches during validation. Consider the following:

  • Sampling Locations: Collect samples at multiple points within the mixing vessel and final bulk gel to capture spatial variability.
  • Sampling Frequency: Include samples from early, mid, and end-of-batch production stages to detect any time-based distribution changes.
  • Sample Size and Number: Determine the minimum number of samples and aliquot size sufficient to provide representative analysis, guided by pharmacopeial guidelines or internal standards.
  • Decision Criteria: Define acceptance criteria for content uniformity, such as percentage relative standard deviation (%RSD) or specific content limits per unit weight.

Protocol Design for Process Performance Qualification (PPQ)

Design the PPQ protocol to validate the manufacturing process for drug distribution uniformity in rectal gels by including the following steps:

  • Batch Size and Number: Specify the number of consecutive commercial-scale batches to be produced, typically three or more.
  • Test Methods: Employ validated analytical methods such as HPLC to assess drug content uniformity and assay.
  • Sampling Plan: Include detailed sampling locations, frequency, and sample handling procedures.
  • Acceptance Criteria: Clearly state content uniformity specifications and statistical limits.
  • Data Handling and Reporting: Define the format for data collection, analysis, and decision-making logic to approve the process.
  • Deviation Management: Include contingencies for potential out-of-specification results and corrective actions.

Execution and Batch Evaluation during PPQ

Execute the PPQ batches following the approved protocol with strict adherence to defined CPPs and control strategy:

  1. Document real-time process parameter values during mixing, homogenization, and cooling phases.
  2. Collect samples according to the sampling plan and conduct drug content uniformity assays promptly.
  3. Evaluate data for compliance with acceptance criteria, focusing on both mean values and variability measures.
  4. Identify any deviations or trends suggesting process drift or instability.
  5. Compile batch manufacturing records including all relevant process data, analytical results, and deviation reports.

Post-batch evaluation should confirm consistent drug distribution uniformity within defined limits, supporting process validation completion and commercial manufacturing readiness.

Introduction to Drug Distribution Uniformity Validation in Rectal Gels Manufacturing

Drug distribution uniformity validation is a critical component in the manufacturing process of rectal gels, ensuring that the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) is evenly distributed within the gel matrix. This validation assures product efficacy, patient safety, and regulatory compliance. This document outlines a structured, step-by-step approach to validate drug distribution uniformity, including verification, documentation, and routine monitoring procedures specific to rectal gels.

Preparation and Preliminary Considerations

Before initiating validation, ensure all raw materials and excipients comply with established pharmacopeial standards. Confirm that all equipment used for mixing, filling, and sampling is qualified (IQ/OQ/PQ) and validated for its intended use. Review standard operating procedures (SOPs) specific to drug uniformity sampling and analysis in rectal gels.

  • Gather previous process data and batch records.
  • Define acceptance criteria for uniformity of drug content (typically % label claim ± specified limits, per regulatory guidelines).
  • Set analytical method validation parameters—precision, accuracy, linearity, and specificity must be established for assay methods.

Sampling Strategy for Drug Distribution Uniformity

Develop a comprehensive sampling plan to capture batch variability. Sampling must represent various locations within the batch to reflect homogeneity accurately.

  1. Divide the batch volume or weight into predefined segments (e.g., top, middle, bottom and at multiple points within the vessel or container).
  2. Collect a minimum of 10 samples per batch from different locations as per USP Uniformity of Dosage Units guidance or equivalent internal standards.
  3. Sample size should be sufficient to meet analytical method requirements without compromising product integrity.

Analytical Methodology and Assay Procedures

Implement validated analytical techniques to determine API concentration in each sample. Common assays include High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) or UV spectrophotometry, depending on the API’s chemical characteristics.

  1. Prepare samples by appropriate dilution and filtration to fit analytical method sensitivity.
  2. Perform replicate analyses (at least triplicate) for precision estimation.
  3. Analyze calibration standards alongside samples to ensure accuracy.
  4. Record all raw data meticulously for documentation and trending purposes.

Validation Result Tabulation Table

Prepare a consolidated results table for at least three consecutive validation batches to demonstrate consistency.


Batch Number Sample Location Assay Result (% Label Claim) Mean Assay (%) Standard Deviation Relative Standard Deviation (RSD %) Compliance Status
Batch 001 Top 98.5 99.2 1.2 1.21 Pass
Batch 001 Middle 99.8
Batch 001 Bottom 99.3
Batch 001 Side 100.1
Batch 001 Center 97.9

Comparative Summary Table Across Validation Batches

Summarize overall mean, standard deviation, and RSD values to confirm process consistency and uniformity.

Batch Number Number of Samples Overall Mean Assay (%) Overall Standard Deviation Overall RSD (%) Compliance
Batch 001 10 99.2 1.2 1.21 Pass
Batch 002 10 99.5 1.0 1.01 Pass
Batch 003 10 99.3 1.3 1.31 Pass

Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) Analysis and Compliance Assessment

Calculate the RSD for each batch to quantify distribution variability. Typically, an RSD ≤ 5% is considered acceptable for uniformity of content in semi-solid dosage forms such as rectal gels. Steps include:

  1. Compute mean and standard deviation for assay results within each batch.
  2. Calculate RSD as: (Standard Deviation / Mean) × 100.
  3. Compare RSD with established limits.
  4. Document any deviations and assess the potential impact on product quality.

Interpretation: An RSD consistently below the limit across batches indicates robust manufacturing and mixing processes ensuring uniform drug distribution.

Process Validation Documentation and Reporting

Comprehensive documentation is required to meet regulatory standards and support ongoing process control:

  • Validation Protocol: Include objectives, acceptance criteria, sampling plan, analytical methods, and responsibilities.
  • Validation Summary Report: Capture summarized data, analysis, conclusions, and recommendations.
  • Data Integrity: Ensure raw data traceability, analyst signatures, date/time stamps, and data review records are maintained.

Continued Process Verification (CPV)

After process validation, implement continued monitoring to ensure ongoing process capability and product uniformity:

  1. Define routine sampling frequency (e.g., per batch or every nth batch) for drug distribution assessment.
  2. Collect and analyze samples as per validated analytical methods.
  3. Use statistical process control (SPC) tools to track trends and detect drifts.
  4. Document all monitoring results in routine CPV reports.
  5. Trigger investigations and corrective actions if results approach alert or action limits.

Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) and Trending

Incorporate drug distribution uniformity data into the APQR and trending reports to support long-term process stability evidence:

  • Review batch data for compliance with uniformity criteria.
  • Analyze trends in assay means, RSDs, and out-of-specification (OOS) incidents.
  • Evaluate effectiveness of process improvements or formulation changes on uniformity.
  • Present summarized findings to quality management and regulatory stakeholders.

Annexures

Below are templates to support comprehensive documentation during drug distribution uniformity validation:

Annexure I: Validation Protocol Template

Title: Drug Distribution Uniformity Validation Protocol for Rectal Gels
Objective: Demonstrate uniform API distribution within gel batches.
Scope: Applies to all manufactured batches at [Facility Name].
Sampling Plan: Number of samples, locations, and frequency.
Analytical Method: Description, validation status, and acceptance criteria.
Responsibilities: Roles of QA, QC, Production, and Validation teams.
Acceptance Criteria: %API per sample within specified limits; RSD ≤ 5%.

Annexure II: Sampling Log Sheet

Batch Number:
Date of Sampling:
Sampling Locations & Coordinates:
Sample ID:
Sample Weight/Volume:
Sampler Name & Signature:
Comments:

Annexure III: Analytical Assay Worksheet

Sample ID:
Preparation Details:
Assay Method:
Replicate Results:
Mean Assay Value:
Standard Deviation:
RSD:
Analyst:
Date:
Reviewer:

Annexure IV: Validation Summary Report Template

Batch Details:
Sampling Summary:
Assay Results & Statistical Analysis:
RSD Calculations:
Compliance Statement:
Deviations and Investigations:
Conclusion & Recommendations:
Signatures:

Annexure V: CPV Monitoring Chart

Batch Number | Sampling Date | Mean Assay (%) | RSD (%) | Pass/Fail | Remarks
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Validation Result Tabulation and Analysis

After analytical testing, document the drug content results systematically for each batch.


Table 1: Drug Content Assay Results for Three Validation Batches
Batch No. Sample Location API Assay (% Label Claim) Replicate 1 (%) Replicate 2 (%) Replicate 3 (%) Mean API Content (%) Standard Deviation Relative Standard Deviation (RSD %)
Batch 1 Top
Middle
Bottom

Instructions: Record the assay results for each sampling site, calculate mean values, standard deviation, and RSD to assess distribution uniformity within each batch.

Comparative Summary and Compliance Evaluation

Compile a summary table comparing distribution uniformity across validation batches to evaluate consistency and compliance.

Table 2: Comparative Summary of Drug Distribution Uniformity Across Validation Batches
Batch No. Mean API Content (%) RSD (%) Compliance to Acceptance Criteria (%) Comments
Batch 1
Batch 2
Batch 3

Evaluate Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) for each batch; an RSD < 6% is generally considered acceptable for drug uniformity in semisolid dosage forms like rectal gels.

Summarize compliance based on predefined acceptance criteria (e.g., API content within ±10% of label claim).

Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Routine Monitoring

After process validation, implement CPV to monitor ongoing control of drug uniformity during commercial manufacturing. Routine sampling and testing should be integrated into the batch release program.

  • Define sampling frequency for routine production batches (e.g., every batch or per defined intervals).
  • Apply the same sampling locations and analytical method as established in validation.
  • Monitor RSD and mean content trends over time to detect process shifts.
  • Investigate any out-of-specification results or trends indicating variability outside control limits.

Maintain detailed records of routine monitoring in batch production files and CPV reports to support product quality and regulatory inspections.

Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) and Trending

Incorporate drug distribution uniformity data into the APQR to evaluate long-term process capability.

  • Aggregate drug content assay results and RSD values across all batches within the review period.
  • Perform statistical trending analysis to identify any drift or variability trends.
  • Recommend corrective actions or process improvements if trends indicate loss of uniformity control.
  • Document all findings and conclusions in the APQR report.

Annexures

Templates provided below are recommended to ensure consistent documentation and facilitate regulatory submission.

Annexure I: Sampling Plan Template

Batch No: _________
Date: ______________
Sampling Locations: Top / Middle / Bottom / Additional Points
Number of Samples: ________
Sampler: ________________
Comments: _______________

Annexure II: Analytical Assay Result Sheet

Sample ID       | Replicate 1 (%) | Replicate 2 (%) | Replicate 3 (%) | Mean (%) | SD | RSD (%)
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
                |                 |                 |                 |          |    | 

Annexure III: Validation Result Summary

Batch No: _______
Mean API Content: _______%
RSD: _______%
Compliance Status: [Compliant/Non-compliant]
Remarks: _____________________________________________________

Annexure IV: CPV Monitoring Log

Batch No | Date | Sampling Location | API Content (%) | RSD (%) | Signature | Remarks
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
         |      |                   |                 |         |           |

Annexure V: APQR Summary Section for Drug Distribution Uniformity

Review Period: ______________

Summary of Batch Results:
- Number of Batches Reviewed: _______
- Average API Content (%): __________
- Average RSD (%): ________________

Trends Observed:
_____________________________________________________________

Corrective Actions / Recommendations:
_____________________________________________________________

Reviewer Name & Signature: ___________________ Date: ___________
See also  Device Functionality Validation in Drug-Device Combinations Manufacturing