Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing

Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing Process

Validating Viscosity Range for Consistent Quality in Emulsions Manufacturing

All equipment used in this process validation must be duly qualified and validated for its intended use and performance specifications. Equipment qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ) is assumed to be completed prior to this process validation.

Introduction to Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing

Step 1: Understand that viscosity in emulsions is a critical physical property directly impacting product stability, efficacy, and patient acceptability. Viscosity range validation is a designed exercise to confirm that the manufacturing process consistently produces emulsions within an established viscosity specification, aligned to the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP).

Step 2: Recognize that emulsions, being biphasic systems with dispersed droplets in a continuous phase, require tightly controlled viscosity to maintain droplet size distribution and prevent phase separation. Accurate viscosity measurement and control ensures reliable dosing and homogeneity in the final pharmaceutical product.

Step 3: Define the scope of the viscosity range validation protocol by identifying the process stages where viscosity control is critical—typically post-homogenization and final batch sampling—as well as the analytical methods employed for measurement.

The Role of Viscosity Validation in cGMP and Consistency of Emulsions

Step 1: Confirm that viscosity range validation is embedded within the framework of current Good Manufacturing Practices (cGMP). This ensures that the manufacturing process is controlled, monitored, and documented to guarantee consistent product quality batch-to-batch.

Step 2: Implement viscosity control points as Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) within the process validation lifecycle. This establishes viscosity as a key driver for process performance and product quality consistency.

Step 3: Conduct validation to verify that viscosity measurement instrumentation, test procedures, and manufacturing process controls yield reproducible results aligned to predefined acceptance criteria.

Step 4: Maintain thorough documentation of validation activities including equipment calibration records, raw data, statistical analysis, and deviation investigations to support regulatory submissions and audits.

Incorporating Viscosity Range into the Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP)

Step 1: Review the established QTPP for the emulsion product to identify viscosity-related attributes that impact safety, efficacy, and patient experience, such as spreadability, texture, and dose uniformity.

Step 2: Translate these product-level requirements into definitive viscosity ranges that align with critical formulation and manufacturing characteristics.

Step 3: Collaborate with formulation scientists and quality assurance to finalize the target viscosity range, confirming it meets therapeutic and regulatory benchmarks.

Step 4: Establish the viscosity range as a critical quality attribute (CQA) within the QTPP to systematically guide process controls and validation efforts.

Desired Attributes of Viscosity in Pharmaceutical Emulsions

Step 1: Define the viscosity profile required to ensure product homogeneity, physical stability, and ease of administration according to dosage form type (e.g., topical, oral emulsions).

Step 2: Identify the acceptable viscosity range that prevents phase separation while ensuring pumpability and patient compliance.

Step 3: Specify the rheological characteristics, such as shear-thinning or thixotropic behavior, which may influence viscosity at different shear rates during manufacturing or application.

Step 4: Assess viscosity in relation to excipient interactions, emulsifier concentration, and temperature dependency to ensure robustness across manufacturing and storage conditions.

Impact of Viscosity on Key Quality Attributes of Emulsions

Step 1: Link viscosity control directly to the stability of the emulsion, understanding that inappropriate viscosity may result in coalescence, creaming, or phase separation, leading to compromised product integrity.

Step 2: Recognize the influence of viscosity on drug release and bioavailability, critical for therapeutic consistency.

Step 3: Evaluate the impact of viscosity on critical appearance attributes, such as gloss and uniformity, that affect patient acceptance and perception of quality.

Step 4: Integrate viscosity monitoring at multiple points within the manufacturing process to control potential variability and maintain compliance with product specifications.

Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs) Related to Viscosity in Emulsions

Step 1: Identify viscosity as a CQA alongside droplet size distribution, pH, and microbial limits, supported by scientifically justified acceptance criteria derived from development and stability studies.

Step 2: Classify viscosity as a dependent attribute influenced by formulation, homogenization speed, temperature, and mixing time.

Step 3: Define measurement methods routinely employed for viscosity determination, such as rotational viscometers or rheometers, validating them as per FDA and ICH guidelines.

Step 4: Establish sampling procedures and frequency during process validation to capture representative data reflecting batch-to-batch consistency of viscosity.

Key Properties to Monitor for Effective Viscosity Validation

Step 1: Monitor temperature closely during viscosity measurements as it strongly affects fluidity and must be controlled for accurate results.

Step 2: Ensure calibration of viscometers and rheometers is up to date and traceable to international standards prior to and during validation activities.

Step 3: Confirm reproducibility of viscosity test results by carrying out replicate measurements under identical conditions and evaluating data variability.

Step 4: Analyze the influence of shear rate on the measured viscosity to characterize rheological behavior, adjusting process parameters accordingly to remain within validated viscosity ranges.

Step 5: Incorporate in-process controls such as online viscosity monitoring where feasible to provide real-time process feedback and corrective control capabilities.

Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing for Consistent Product Quality

Viscosity Range Validation to Ensure Consistent Quality in Emulsions Manufacturing

All equipment used in this process validation must be duly qualified and validated for its intended use and performance specifications. Equipment qualification (IQ/OQ/PQ) is assumed to be completed prior to this process validation.

Quality Target Product Profile (QTPP) and Desired Viscosity Attributes

Step 1: Establish the QTPP focusing on product quality attributes critical to performance, safety, and patient compliance. Viscosity is a defining characteristic that influences product texture, spreadability, and dosing accuracy in emulsions.

Step 2: Define desired viscosity attributes such as target viscosity range, shear-thinning behavior, and stability over shelf life in alignment with therapeutic use and patient handling requirements.

Step 3: Correlate viscosity criteria within the QTPP to other product attributes like droplet size distribution, physical stability, and homogeneity to form a comprehensive quality framework.

See also  Filling Volume Validation in Intravenous Infusions Manufacturing

Impact of Viscosity on Critical Quality Attributes (CQAs)

Step 1: Identify viscosity as a Critical Quality Attribute (CQA) due to its direct influence on emulsion stability and performance.

Step 2: Evaluate how deviations in viscosity impact other CQAs such as phase separation, product appearance, and dose uniformity.

Step 3: Use risk assessment tools to prioritize viscosity control to mitigate potential negative impacts on product quality and patient safety.

Key Properties and Parameters for Viscosity Range Validation

Step 1: Select appropriate rheological parameters to monitor, such as apparent viscosity at relevant shear rates, yield stress, and thixotropy, reflecting processing and end-use conditions.

Step 2: Define sampling points within the manufacturing process — for example, after emulsification and post-homogenization — to capture viscosity consistency throughout production.

Step 3: Establish validated analytical methods (e.g., rotational viscometry, cone-and-plate rheometry) with defined calibration protocols, ensuring precise, reproducible viscosity measurements.

Step 4: Set acceptance criteria for viscosity that align with historical data, formulation characteristics, and clinical performance.

Introduction to Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing

Viscosity range validation is a critical component of process validation in emulsions manufacturing. It ensures that the final product meets predefined rheological standards, which affect product performance, stability, and patient acceptability. This document provides a stepwise framework to validate viscosity ranges in emulsified dosage forms using risk-based approaches, experimental designs, and robust monitoring systems.

Conduct Risk Assessment and Failure Mode Effects Analysis (FMEA)

Begin by identifying potential failure modes related to viscosity deviations during emulsification. Consider equipment variability, raw material quality, environmental conditions, and process parameters as possible contributors.

  • List possible failure points such as mixing speed fluctuations, temperature variations, phase inversion issues, or improper emulsifier concentration.
  • Evaluate severity (impact on product quality and stability), occurrence (likelihood of failure), and detectability (ability to identify failure before release).
  • Score each failure mode using a risk priority number (RPN) calculated by multiplying severity, occurrence, and detectability scores.
  • Prioritize high-risk modes that significantly impact viscosity control for mitigation and detailed study.

Define Critical Process Parameters (CPPs) and Critical Material Attributes (CMAs)

Identify CPPs that influence viscosity specifically in the emulsification process. Common CPPs include:

  • Agitator speed and mixing time
  • Temperature during mixing and emulsification
  • Order and rate of ingredient addition
  • Droplet size distribution controlled by homogenization pressure

Critical Material Attributes that influence viscosity:

  • Emulsifier type and concentration
  • Oil phase properties including viscosity and density
  • Aqueous phase viscosity and composition

Establish acceptable ranges for each CPP and CMA based on historical data, supplier specifications, and preliminary studies.

Design of Experiments (DoE) for Viscosity Range Definition

Develop a statistically designed experiment to investigate the impact of selected CPPs and CMAs on viscosity. Guidance for DoE setup:

  • Use factorial or fractional factorial designs to examine main effects and interactions.
  • Set viscosity as the response variable with a well-defined measurement method.
  • Include process parameters such as mixing speed (e.g., low, mid, high), temperature (e.g., 20°C, 40°C, 60°C), and emulsifier concentration (e.g., 0.5%, 1.0%, 1.5%).
  • Run replicates to study variability and improve statistical power.

Analyze data with ANOVA and regression to identify statistically significant factors and establish a robust process window that maintains viscosity within target specifications.

Establish Control Strategy and Acceptable Viscosity Ranges

Based on DoE results and risk assessment, finalize the control strategy for viscosity:

  • Define the target viscosity range and acceptable upper and lower limits.
  • Specify CPP ranges for agitation, temperature, and raw material attributes to maintain this range.
  • Incorporate in-process control checks such as viscosity measurements at defined points.
  • Determine corrective actions if viscosity measurements fall outside acceptable boundaries.

Ensure this strategy aligns with overall quality by design (QbD) principles, supporting consistent manufacture of emulsions within validated viscosity specifications.

Develop Process Flow and Stepwise Workflow for Viscosity Validation

Create a detailed process flow diagram incorporating all critical steps where viscosity is influenced or controlled. Define the workflow clearly:

  1. Raw material receipt and qualification ensuring material attributes meet defined CMAs.
  2. Pre-mixing stages – verify temperature and preliminary viscosity to ensure baseline consistency.
  3. Emulsification step – monitor mixing speed, temperature controls, and homogenization parameters.
  4. Sampling points for viscosity measurement – for example, after pre-emulsification, post-homogenization, and final batch.
  5. Post-processing checks including temperature equilibration and final viscosity confirmation.

This flow chart and stepwise workflow must be incorporated into the process validation protocol to standardize execution.

Sampling and Decision Points During Validation Batches

Establish a sampling plan consistent with process criticality:

  • Define sampling locations – at minimum before homogenization, immediately after, and at final batch stage.
  • Specify sampling frequency for each batch, such as triplicate samples per critical point.
  • Use validated viscometers with standardized test procedures ensuring repeatability and accuracy.
  • Implement immediate decision criteria for each sample measurement: accept batch continuation if viscosity is within limits, trigger investigation or batch hold if out-of-specification.

Protocol Design for Process Performance Qualification (PPQ)

Compose a comprehensive validation protocol including the following:

  • Objective: Confirm consistent manufacture of emulsions within the validated viscosity range.
  • Scope: Define product, equipment, process parameters, and sampling/testing methodology.
  • Responsibilities: Assign roles for execution, data collection, and review.
  • Batch size and number: Typically execute three consecutive commercial-scale batches.
  • Acceptance criteria: Predefined viscosity ranges at each sampling point.
  • Deviation handling: Procedures for investigating excursions and defining corrective/preventive actions (CAPA).
  • Data analysis plan: Statistical evaluation of viscosity measurements and CPP controls.

Batch Execution and Evaluation

Execute PPQ batches strictly following the protocol and process workflow:

  1. Pre-run checks: Verify equipment qualification and raw material conformance.
  2. Process execution: Maintain CPPs within validated ranges and record real-time parameters.
  3. Sampling: Collect viscosity samples as planned, perform in-process testing promptly.
  4. Data review: Compare results against specification limits immediately and at batch completion.
  5. Batch release decision: Approve batches only if all viscosity measurements comply with limits and no critical deviations occur.
See also  Weight Uniformity Validation in Medicated Chewing Gums Manufacturing

Perform a comprehensive final report consolidating data, statistical analysis, conclusions on process capability, and confirmation of viscosity range control.

Ongoing Monitoring and Continuous Improvement

Post-validation, establish ongoing viscosity monitoring within routine manufacturing:

  • Implement in-process controls as per the confirmed control strategy.
  • Conduct periodic trending of viscosity data to detect drifts or shifts.
  • Utilize process capability indices (Cp, Cpk) to assess ongoing process robustness.
  • Trigger continuous improvement initiatives if data indicate trends outside historical validation bounds.

This ensures long-term consistency of emulsions quality related to viscosity and supports regulatory compliance for process validation maintenance.

Conclusion

Validating the viscosity range in emulsions manufacturing requires a structured, risk-based approach integrating thorough risk assessment, controlled experimentation, and robust process controls. Following the above stepwise instructions allows pharmaceutical manufacturers to establish scientifically justified process limits, ensure batch-to-batch consistency, and maintain high product quality, ultimately safeguarding patient safety and compliance.

Develop Control Strategy and Establish Acceptable Viscosity Ranges

Based on DoE results, define control limits for each CPP and CMA that ensure the viscosity remains within the targeted range. This control strategy should include:

  • Process controls: Tight monitoring and regulation of agitator speed, temperature, and mixing time during production.
  • Material controls: Verify raw material specifications for emulsifier concentration and phase viscosities before use.
  • In-process testing: Real-time or near real-time viscosity measurements during critical stages, e.g., post-homogenization and final blend.
  • Acceptance criteria: Predefined viscosity range limits that guarantee product performance and stability.

Define Sampling and Monitoring Plan

Develop a systematic sampling plan to assess viscosity throughout batch production:

  • Sampling points: Collect samples at key process stages—after emulsification, post-homogenization, and final product.
  • Frequency: At predefined intervals within each batch and across multiple batches in the validation campaign.
  • Testing methodology: Utilize validated viscometers with defined operating procedures to ensure precise and reproducible results.
  • Decision rules: Define appraisal thresholds and actions if viscosity measurements fall outside specified limits (e.g., batch hold, reprocessing, or rejection).

Perform Process Performance Qualification (PPQ)

Execute multiple consecutive batches under validated control strategies to demonstrate consistent viscosity control:

  • Use trained personnel operating under full production conditions.
  • Document all CPP settings, raw material lot numbers, environmental conditions, and viscosity results for each batch.
  • Evaluate process capability indices (Cp, Cpk) to assess process robustness relative to viscosity specifications.
  • Identify any trends or deviations and implement corrective actions if necessary.

Analyze Batch Data and Evaluate Validation Outcomes

Review all collected data from PPQ batches to confirm that viscosity consistently meets the predetermined acceptance criteria:

  • Statistically analyze data for repeatability, stability, and control over viscosity ranges.
  • Investigate any out-of-specification events or variability causes through root cause analysis.
  • Update risk assessments and control measures as required based on findings.

Protocol Design and Documentation

Prepare a detailed viscosity range validation protocol including:

  • Objectives: Define purpose and scope of validation related to emulsion viscosity.
  • Responsibilities: Assign roles for execution, monitoring, and data analysis.
  • Methods: Describe equipment, materials, DoE design, sampling plan, and testing methods.
  • Acceptance criteria: Declare viscosity ranges and batch qualification standards.
  • Action plans: Specify contingency measures for deviations or failures.
  • Reporting: Format and timelines for validation report submission.

Continuous Monitoring and Post-Validation Control

Once validated, implement ongoing viscosity monitoring as part of routine manufacturing control:

  • Leverage Statistical Process Control (SPC) tools to detect early shifts or trends.
  • Incorporate periodic revalidation triggers based on changes in raw materials, equipment, or process modifications.
  • Maintain documented evidence of all monitoring activities and corrective actions.

Introduction to Viscosity Range Validation in Emulsions Manufacturing

Viscosity range validation in emulsions manufacturing is a critical process validation activity that ensures consistent product quality and manufacturability within pre-defined viscosity parameters. Emulsions being complex multiphase systems require precise viscosity control to meet stability, efficacy, and aesthetic requirements. This document outlines a stepwise approach to validate the viscosity range during emulsification, with emphasis on verification, documentation, and routine monitoring relevant to pharmaceutical manufacturing environments.

Preparation and Equipment Qualification Confirmation

Ensure all rheological measurement equipment and viscometers have undergone Installation Qualification (IQ), Operational Qualification (OQ), and Performance Qualification (PQ). Equipment used for viscosity determination must be calibrated traceable to national standards. Confirm documentation of equipment qualification is complete before starting viscosity validation batches.

Defining the Viscosity Acceptance Criteria and Target Range

Establish the viscosity range based on developmental studies, including bench scale emulsification experiments and prior commercial batch data. Define both the lower and upper viscosity limits (e.g., 1500–3000 cP) representing acceptable product consistency and process capability. Include specification rationale linked to product performance attributes such as droplet size distribution, stability, and application properties.

Selection of Representative Manufacturing Batches for Validation

Choose a minimum of three consecutive batches manufactured under consistent process parameters for process validation. The batches should represent routine manufacturing conditions and ingredient variability, reflecting a typical production environment. Document batch production records and ensure all process steps were executed per standard operating procedures (SOPs).

Viscosity Measurement Procedure During Batch Production

Conduct viscosity measurements at predetermined sampling points during manufacture:

  • Immediately post-emulsification
  • During cooling stage
  • Final bulk emulsion before filling

Use the same viscometer model and measurement conditions such as spindle type, shear rate, and temperature control to maintain consistency. Record triplicate viscosity readings per sample point and calculate averages with standard deviations.

Compilation of Validation Result Tabulation Table

Create a tabulated summary consolidating viscosity data for all three batches across sampling points. The table should contain:

Batch No. Sampling Point Viscosity Reading 1 (cP) Viscosity Reading 2 (cP) Viscosity Reading 3 (cP) Average Viscosity (cP) Standard Deviation (cP) Compliance Status
Batch 1 Post-Emulsification 1850 1870 1845 1855 13.1 Within Range
Batch 1 Cooling Stage 2100 2125 2110 2111 12.5 Within Range
Batch 1 Final Bulk 2500 2475 2490 2488 13.1 Within Range
Batch 2 Post-Emulsification 1830 1855 1840 1842 12.5 Within Range
Batch 2 Cooling Stage 2085 2100 2090 2091 7.6 Within Range
Batch 2 Final Bulk 2525 2500 2510 2511 12.5 Within Range
Batch 3 Post-Emulsification 1865 1850 1875 1863 12.5 Within Range
Batch 3 Cooling Stage 2115 2130 2120 2122 7.6 Within Range
Batch 3 Final Bulk 2480 2495 2470 2481 12.5 Within Range
See also  Viscosity Validation in Ear Gels Manufacturing

Comparative Summary and Statistical Analysis

Formulate a comparative table to summarize the average viscosities across batches and sampling points highlighting Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) and compliance with acceptance criteria. Use the following parameters for each sample location:

  • Average viscosity across batches
  • Maximum and minimum values observed
  • RSD percent to assess batch-to-batch variability
  • Compliance to established viscosity range
  • Identification of optimum viscosity zone ensuring product stability and performance
Sampling Point Average Viscosity (cP) Minimum Viscosity (cP) Maximum Viscosity (cP) RSD (%) Compliance Status Optimum Viscosity Range (cP)
Post-Emulsification 1853 1830 1875 0.70 Within Range 1800–1900
Cooling Stage 2108 2085 2130 0.66 Within Range 2050–2150
Final Bulk 2493 2470 2525 0.56 Within Range 2450–2550

An RSD of less than 1% across batches indicates excellent process control and minimal batch-to-batch variation. Compliance confirms robustness of the manufacturing process in maintaining product viscosity within the qualified range. The optimum viscosity range supports product stability and end-user expectations.

Documentation and Verification in Continued Process Verification (CPV)

After process validation, implement continued process verification for viscosity measurements under routine manufacturing:

  • Schedule daily viscosity checks for critical batches.
  • Maintain electronic or hardcopy logs with traceability to batch and measurement conditions.
  • Evaluate deviations or drift outside acceptance limits immediately to identify root causes.
  • Analyze trends over time using control charts (e.g., Shewhart or CUSUM).
  • Investigate and document corrective actions and preventive actions (CAPA) when variations are detected.

Inclusion of Viscosity in Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) and Trending

Integrate viscosity data into the APQR to identify any trends impacting product quality or process capability. The APQR should:

  • Compare viscosity trends against historical data and specification limits.
  • Flag any recurrent patterns suggesting raw material or equipment issues.
  • Recommend process improvements or requalification if significant deviations occur.
  • Form part of the product quality system ensuring lifecycle control.

Annexure Templates for Viscosity Range Validation

The following annexure templates should be used to maintain comprehensive records and facilitate audits:

  • Annexure I: Viscosity Measurement Raw Data Sheet (including batch number, sampling time, replicate readings, operator, equipment ID)
  • Annexure II: Equipment Calibration and Qualification Records for Viscometers
  • Annexure III: Validation Batch Production Records referencing viscosity measurement points
  • Annexure IV: Process Validation Summary Report including statistical analysis and compliance statements
  • Annexure V: CPV Monitoring Log Templates and Trending Charts for viscosity data

Maintaining these annexures supports compliance with regulatory expectations for process validation and manufacturing control.

Conclusion

Viscosity range validation is essential to confirming manufacturing consistency of emulsions. Following a strict stepwise approach, documenting results, statistical analysis, continued monitoring, and inclusion in APQRs ensure the process remains in a validated state. This practice reduces batch failure risks and guarantees product quality and performance.

Compilation and Analysis of Validation Results

Validation Result Tabulation for Viscosity (cP)
Batch No. Post-Emulsification Cooling Stage Final Bulk
Batch 1 1800 2100 2300
Batch 2 1750 2050 2200
Batch 3 1850 2150 2250

Calculate Relative Standard Deviation (RSD) for each sampling point across batches to evaluate consistency:

  • RSD Acceptability: Typically, an RSD less than 10% indicates acceptable process variability.
  • Evaluate mean viscosity against acceptance criteria (e.g., 1500–3000 cP).
  • Identify any outliers or trends deviating from the expected range.

Comparative Summary and Compliance Review

Comparative Summary of Viscosity Validation
Measurement Point Mean Viscosity (cP) RSD (%) Acceptance Range (cP) Compliance Status Optimum Viscosity Target
Post-Emulsification 1800 2.8 1500–3000 Compliant 1800–2000
Cooling Stage 2100 2.4 1500–3000 Compliant 2000–2200
Final Bulk 2250 2.3 1500–3000 Compliant 2200–2400

Summary:

  • All batches fall within the defined acceptance range.
  • RSD values indicate robustness and reproducibility of the emulsification process.
  • Optimum viscosity targets can guide routine manufacturing to maintain product quality.

Continued Process Verification (CPV) and Routine Monitoring

Following successful validation, implement a CPV plan tailored to viscosity monitoring:

  1. Sampling Frequency: Measure viscosity for every batch at predefined stages (e.g., post-emulsification, cooling, final bulk).
  2. Critical Control Limits: Maintain established viscosity acceptance criteria as control limits.
  3. Trend Analysis: Use statistical tools (control charts, moving averages) to detect process drifts or systematic deviations early.
  4. Deviation Handling: Investigate and document out-of-specification (OOS) events with corrective and preventive actions (CAPA).
  5. Training: Ensure operators and analysts are trained on measurement procedures and data interpretation.

Annual Product Quality Review (APQR) and Trending

Integrate viscosity data into APQR to support long-term process control and continuous improvement:

  • Collect and review viscosity data across manufacture batches over the year.
  • Analyze trends for shifts, drifts, or unusual variability.
  • Correlate viscosity trends with product stability, batch rejection rates, and customer complaints.
  • Use findings to update process controls, batch release criteria, or manufacturing parameters.
  • Document APQR conclusions and recommended actions.

Annexure I: Equipment Qualification Checklist Template

  • Equipment ID and Model
  • IQ, OQ, PQ Documentation Status
  • Calibration Date and Traceability
  • Maintenance Records
  • Acceptance Criteria Confirmation
  • Responsible Personnel Sign-off

Annexure II: Viscosity Measurement SOP Template

  • Purpose and Scope
  • Equipment and Materials Required
  • Sample Collection and Handling
  • Measurement Procedure (Spindle, Speed, Temperature)
  • Recording and Reporting Data
  • Calibration Verification Steps

Annexure III: Viscosity Validation Result Form Template

  • Batch No. and Manufacturing Date
  • Sampling Point and Time
  • Measured Viscosity Values
  • Operator and Analyst Names
  • Deviation Notes (if any)
  • Approval Signatures

Annexure IV: CPV Monitoring Log Template

  • Batch Number
  • Sampling Date and Time
  • Viscosity Values at Each Stage
  • Control Limits and Compliance Status
  • Corrective Actions Taken
  • Reviewer’s Comments

Annexure V: APQR Viscosity Trending Analysis Template

  • Summary of Batch Viscosity Data (Yearly)
  • Control Chart with Upper and Lower Limits
  • Statistical Summary (Mean, RSD, Outliers)
  • Correlation with Quality Attributes and Stability Data
  • Conclusions and Recommendations